MattermostvsTelegram
Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.
Quick answer: Mattermost vs Telegram
In our 2026 comparison of Mattermost and Telegram, Mattermost comes out ahead overall (weighted score 89% vs 84% for Telegram). Mattermost is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews; Telegram is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Mattermost has a free plan; Telegram has a free plan.
Last updated
| At a glance | Mattermost | Telegram |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Team Chat & Messaging | Team Chat & Messaging |
| User rating | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free trial | Yes | Not listed |
| Listed features | 19 | 16 |
| Integrations | 6 | — |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS | Not specified |
| Ease of use | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Customer support | 5.0/5 | 5.0/5 |
Mattermost
Starting Price
Free self-hosted edition available; Professional and Enterprise plans available through annual subscriptions
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- Self-hosted, open-source messaging platform offering true data sovereignty through air-gapped deployment with no internet connectivity or vendor telemetry .
- Community Edition is completely free with unlimited message history, file sharing, and comprehensive audit logging for compliance.
- Strong security architecture with open-source code allowing independent security verification and penetration testing by government agencies .
Cons
- Recent versions have removed some features and introduced confusing licensing changes, alienating parts of the community.
- Lacks native end-to-end encryption without requiring plugins or workarounds, unlike some competitors like Rocket.Chat .
- Setup and ongoing maintenance require technical expertise for self-hosted deployment, including server management and updates.
Telegram
Starting Price
Contact Vendor
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- MTProto 2.0 encryption protocol with 256-bit symmetric AES encryption, RSA-2048 key exchange, and Diffie-Hellman perfect forward secrecy secures messaging across server-client and end-to-end encrypted secret chats.
- Distributed server infrastructure across multiple jurisdictions with client-accessible proxy support (MTProxy, SOCKS5) enables operation in regions with internet censorship without VPN dependency.
- Bot API with inline keyboard markup, webhook callbacks, and payment integration (Telegram Stars) enables programmable mini-applications that run entirely within Telegram chats.
Cons
- Default chats are not end-to-end encrypted; only explicitly initiated "Secret Chats" use E2E encryption, and these are device-specific with no multi-device sync or group chat support.
- Phone number as mandatory account identifier eliminates anonymity options available in competing messengers; every account is permanently linked to a verified mobile number.
- Content moderation is inconsistent across channels; large public groups frequently distribute pirated media and malware links without proactive takedown until user reports accumulate.
Product Overview
What each platform does and who it's for
Primary Category
The main classification for each product
Editorial Quality Rating
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Mattermost
Expert Score
Telegram
Expert Score
Integration Ecosystem
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Mattermost Integrations
Telegram Integrations
No top integrations listed
Platform Support
Supported platforms across each product
Mattermost
Telegram
Platform support not specified
No platform details listed for this software
Sentiment & Feedback
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
Mattermost Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- Self-hosted, open-source messaging platform offering true data sovereignty through air-gapped deployment with no internet connectivity or vendor telemetry .
- Community Edition is completely free with unlimited message history, file sharing, and comprehensive audit logging for compliance.
- Strong security architecture with open-source code allowing independent security verification and penetration testing by government agencies .
- Transparent per-user licensing model avoids vendor lock-in and unexpected price escalations common with proprietary platforms.
- Recent versions have removed some features and introduced confusing licensing changes, alienating parts of the community.
- Lacks native end-to-end encryption without requiring plugins or workarounds, unlike some competitors like Rocket.Chat .
- Setup and ongoing maintenance require technical expertise for self-hosted deployment, including server management and updates.
Telegram Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- MTProto 2.0 encryption protocol with 256-bit symmetric AES encryption, RSA-2048 key exchange, and Diffie-Hellman perfect forward secrecy secures messaging across server-client and end-to-end encrypted secret chats.
- Distributed server infrastructure across multiple jurisdictions with client-accessible proxy support (MTProxy, SOCKS5) enables operation in regions with internet censorship without VPN dependency.
- Bot API with inline keyboard markup, webhook callbacks, and payment integration (Telegram Stars) enables programmable mini-applications that run entirely within Telegram chats.
- File sharing with no practical size limit (up to 2GB per file on standard accounts, 4GB on Premium) supports uncompressed media transfer without cloud storage provider workarounds.
- Default chats are not end-to-end encrypted; only explicitly initiated "Secret Chats" use E2E encryption, and these are device-specific with no multi-device sync or group chat support.
- Phone number as mandatory account identifier eliminates anonymity options available in competing messengers; every account is permanently linked to a verified mobile number.
- Content moderation is inconsistent across channels; large public groups frequently distribute pirated media and malware links without proactive takedown until user reports accumulate.
Feature Comparison
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
Mattermost
19/26 features
- AI integration
- Automation
- Integrations
- Workflow Automation
- Cloud backup
- Developer API
- Large group chats
- Screen Sharing
- Team collaboration
- Team messaging
- Security
- Security controls
- Voice calls
- Custom stickers
- Secure channels
- Chat features
- Direct messaging and group chats
- Group chat
- Live Chat
- Real-time Chat
- Team chat
- Cloud-based
- Hosting
- Self-hosting
- Collaboration
- File sharing
Telegram
15/26 features
- AI integration
- Automation
- Integrations
- Workflow Automation
- Cloud backup
- Developer API
- Large group chats
- Screen Sharing
- Team collaboration
- Team messaging
- Security
- Security controls
- Voice calls
- Custom stickers
- Secure channels
- Chat features
- Direct messaging and group chats
- Group chat
- Live Chat
- Real-time Chat
- Team chat
- Cloud-based
- Hosting
- Self-hosting
- Collaboration
- File sharing
Login to see the complete feature comparison
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Pricing & Plans
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Mattermost Pricing
PaidPer user per month.
Telegram Pricing
FreeFree to use. No credit card required.
Login to see detailed pricing plans & tiers
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Community Intelligence
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Community Matchup Voting
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Community vs. Editorial Alignment
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting
Mattermost
Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Awaiting Votes
Cast your vote above to update results.
Which software did you choose?
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Promote to Mattermost vs Telegram Buyers
Capture high-intent Team Chat & Messaging evaluators
Head-to-Head Winner Analysis
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
Matchup Scoreboard
At-a-glance scorecard results
Weighted Overall Scorecard
Normalized composite performance scores
Smart Recommendation Matrix
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
- Organizations requiring enterprise SLA support, governance, and custom security
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Fast-moving teams needing fluid channel huddles, app bots, and external channel sharing
- Organizations that place high importance on responsive customer support
Mattermost
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Mattermost wins overall with a weighted score of 89% based on user rating, pricing, features, usability, and support.
Mattermost has the most accessible pricing ($10/mo (Free Trial)).
Mattermost lists the most features (19 features).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Reliable support with a user rating of 5.0/5 stars.
Not enough data on the other product(s) to rank this dimension fairly.
Telegram
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Telegram is a runner-up with a composite score of 84%.
Pricing: $0/mo (No Free Trial), a less accessible entry point than the leader.
Offers 16 features (fewer than the category leader).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Reliable support with a user rating of 5.0/5 stars.
No data available for this product on this dimension yet.
Final Verdict:Mattermost
Mattermost scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 5-point lead in our weighted analysis.
Promote Your Software to Team Chat & Messaging Decision Makers
Frequently asked questions: Mattermost vs Telegram
Which is better: Mattermost or Telegram?
Mattermost scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 5-point lead in our weighted analysis. The best choice still depends on your team's workflow, budget and required integrations — use the side-by-side sections above to check the details that matter to you.
How do users rate Mattermost and Telegram?
Mattermost is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Telegram is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
How much do Mattermost and Telegram cost?
Mattermost has a free plan. Telegram has a free plan. Always confirm current pricing on the vendor's site, as plans change.
Do Mattermost and Telegram offer a free plan or free trial?
Mattermost offers a free plan and a free trial; Telegram offers a free plan.
Which platforms do Mattermost and Telegram support?
Mattermost supports Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS and Android; platform support is not specified for the others.
Which is easier to use, Mattermost or Telegram?
Mattermost has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5, Telegram has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5. The difference is small, so both are similarly easy to adopt.
Most Helpful Reviews
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
Mattermost provides a straightforward, dependable solution that integrated smoothly into our operational stack. Uptime is consistent and user adoption across the team was immediate.
We have been using Mattermost across our departments and appreciate the simplicity and stability of the system. It handles core workflows without unnecessary bloat.
The platform has streamlined our daily operations, providing reliable tools and responsive support. Configuration was quick and the feature set aligns well with our requirements.
A well-built tool that delivers consistent value. The interface is clean, performance is snappy, and our operational workflows run smoothly.
Login to read full user reviews
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Trending Software
Calculated via real engagement & conversions
Best Alternatives in Team Chat & Messaging
Other highly-rated software you might want to consider
