Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.


In our 2026 comparison of Loom and ScreenFlow, Loom comes out ahead overall (weighted score 91% vs 84% for ScreenFlow). Loom is rated 4.8/5 from 65 user reviews; ScreenFlow is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Loom has a free plan; ScreenFlow starts at $169/month.
Last updated
| At a glance | Loom | ScreenFlow |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Screen Recording Software | Screen Recording Software |
| User rating | 4.8/5 (65 reviews) | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) |
| Starting price | Free plan | $169/mo |
| Listed features | 12 | 14 |
| Integrations | 5 | 4 |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Web | macOS |
| Ease of use | 4.6/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Customer support | 4.6/5 | 5.0/5 |
What each platform does and who it's for
The main classification for each product
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Expert Score
Expert Score
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Supported platforms across each product
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
User sentiment analysis
User sentiment analysis
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
12/22 features
14/22 features
Login to see the complete feature comparison
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Quick video messaging for individuals.
Advanced recording & analytics for teams.
Advanced administration and security.
Login to see detailed pricing plans & tiers
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting

Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Cast your vote above to update results.
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Capture high-intent Screen Recording Software evaluators
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
At-a-glance scorecard results
Normalized composite performance scores
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
Dimension scorecard
Loom wins overall with a weighted score of 91% based on user rating, pricing, features, usability, and support.
Loom has the most accessible pricing ($12.5/mo (No Free Trial)).
Offers 12 features (fewer than the category leader).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.6/5 stars.
Decent support with a user rating of 4.6/5 stars.
Widest platform availability (3 Platforms: Windows, macOS, Web).
Dimension scorecard
ScreenFlow is a runner-up with a composite score of 84%.
Pricing: $169/mo (No Free Trial), a less accessible entry point than the leader.
ScreenFlow lists the most features (14 features).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Ranked #1 for support with a user rating of 5.0/5 stars.
Available on 1 Platform: macOS, fewer than the leader.

Loom scores higher across 3 of 11 key dimensions with a 7-point lead in our weighted analysis.
Loom scores higher across 3 of 11 key dimensions with a 7-point lead in our weighted analysis. The best choice still depends on your team's workflow, budget and required integrations — use the side-by-side sections above to check the details that matter to you.
Loom is rated 4.8/5 from 65 user reviews. ScreenFlow is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
Loom has a free plan. ScreenFlow starts at $169/month. Loom has the lower entry price. Always confirm current pricing on the vendor's site, as plans change.
Loom offers a free plan; ScreenFlow does not list a free plan or trial.
Loom supports Windows, macOS and Web; ScreenFlow supports macOS.
Loom has an ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5, ScreenFlow has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5. The difference is small, so both are similarly easy to adopt.
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
After adopting Loom for async video communication across our engineering team, our product manager received nine timestamped comments and four emoji reactions within two hours of sharing the feature demo without scheduling a meeting.
After adopting Loom for async video communication across our engineering team, Loom AI condensed our twelve-minute sprint planning video into six bullet points allowing our distributed team to catch up in under a minute.
After our design team selected Loom for async feedback sharing, the floating webcam bubble connected our face to the screen walkthrough helping our customer associate our personality with the technical explanation.
Once our customer success team configured Loom for client onboarding, the engagement heatmap revealed that viewers consistently stopped watching at minute three-forty allowing us to rerecord that confusing section.
Login to read full user reviews
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Calculated via real engagement & conversions





Other highly-rated software you might want to consider