Process StreetvsProcessMaker
Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.
Quick answer: Process Street vs ProcessMaker
In our 2026 comparison of Process Street and ProcessMaker, the products are too closely matched to name a clear overall winner. Process Street is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews; ProcessMaker is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews.
Last updated
| At a glance | Process Street | ProcessMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Business Process Management (BPM) | Business Process Management (BPM) |
| User rating | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) |
| Listed features | 11 | 11 |
| Integrations | 5 | 5 |
| Ease of use | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Customer support | 5.0/5 | 5.0/5 |
Process Street
Starting Price
Contact Vendor
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- Helps cross-functional teams stay on task when working on time-sensitive projects, providing clear visual progress tracking for each step of complex workflows .
- New hires can easily track their progress through training checklists, making onboarding consistent and auditable across the organization .
- Provides a centralized repository for standard operating procedures (SOPs), ensuring all team members follow the same processes rather than tribal knowledge .
Cons
- Occasional bugs and connection issues disrupt workflow execution, particularly when running time-sensitive processes that require uninterrupted operation .
- Heavily relies on external applications and connections; the platform's utility diminishes significantly if your tech stack isn't already integrated .
- Publishing can be glitchy at times, and changes to checklists don't always propagate immediately to running instances .
ProcessMaker
Starting Price
Contact Vendor
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- Open-source heritage with a strong workflow engine that supports both BPMN 2.0 standard and custom scripting for enterprise process orchestration.
- Drag-and-drop interface for designing complex approval chains, forms, and conditional routing without extensive coding requirements.
- Multi-language and multi-currency support for global deployments across regions with different regulatory requirements.
Cons
- Documentation, while comprehensive, can be technical and assumes familiarity with BPMN standards, creating a learning curve for business users.
- Smaller partner and consultant ecosystem compared to industry giants like Pega or Appian, potentially limiting implementation support options.
- Advanced analytics and AI-powered process mining features lag behind larger competitors with more R&D investment in intelligent automation.
Product Overview
What each platform does and who it's for
Primary Category
The main classification for each product
Editorial Quality Rating
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Process Street
Expert Score
ProcessMaker
Expert Score
Integration Ecosystem
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Process Street Integrations
ProcessMaker Integrations
Platform Support
Supported platforms across each product
Process Street
Platform support not specified
No platform details listed for this software
ProcessMaker
Platform support not specified
No platform details listed for this software
Sentiment & Feedback
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
Process Street Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- Helps cross-functional teams stay on task when working on time-sensitive projects, providing clear visual progress tracking for each step of complex workflows .
- New hires can easily track their progress through training checklists, making onboarding consistent and auditable across the organization .
- Provides a centralized repository for standard operating procedures (SOPs), ensuring all team members follow the same processes rather than tribal knowledge .
- Conditional logic allows dynamic checklists that adapt based on previous answers, reducing manual branching and ensuring users only see relevant steps .
- Occasional bugs and connection issues disrupt workflow execution, particularly when running time-sensitive processes that require uninterrupted operation .
- Heavily relies on external applications and connections; the platform's utility diminishes significantly if your tech stack isn't already integrated .
- Publishing can be glitchy at times, and changes to checklists don't always propagate immediately to running instances .
ProcessMaker Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- Open-source heritage with a strong workflow engine that supports both BPMN 2.0 standard and custom scripting for enterprise process orchestration.
- Drag-and-drop interface for designing complex approval chains, forms, and conditional routing without extensive coding requirements.
- Multi-language and multi-currency support for global deployments across regions with different regulatory requirements.
- Available both as cloud SaaS and self-hosted options, offering deployment flexibility for organizations with data residency constraints.
- Documentation, while comprehensive, can be technical and assumes familiarity with BPMN standards, creating a learning curve for business users.
- Smaller partner and consultant ecosystem compared to industry giants like Pega or Appian, potentially limiting implementation support options.
- Advanced analytics and AI-powered process mining features lag behind larger competitors with more R&D investment in intelligent automation.
Feature Comparison
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
Process Street
11/14 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- App Integrations
- Workflow Automation
- Workflow management
- Cross-device sync
- Offline access
- Open-source
- Security
- Team collaboration
- Automation
- Template library
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
- Document creation
ProcessMaker
11/14 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- App Integrations
- Workflow Automation
- Workflow management
- Cross-device sync
- Offline access
- Open-source
- Security
- Team collaboration
- Automation
- Template library
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
- Document creation
Login to see the complete feature comparison
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Pricing & Plans
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Process Street Pricing
Custom configurations tailored to your organization.
ProcessMaker Pricing
Free to use. No credit card required.
Login to see detailed pricing plans & tiers
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Community Intelligence
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Community Matchup Voting
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Community vs. Editorial Alignment
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting
Draw
Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Awaiting Votes
Cast your vote above to update results.
Which software did you choose?
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Promote to Process Street vs ProcessMaker Buyers
Capture high-intent Business Process Management (BPM) evaluators
Head-to-Head Winner Analysis
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
Matchup Scoreboard
At-a-glance scorecard results
Weighted Overall Scorecard
Normalized composite performance scores
Smart Recommendation Matrix
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
- Power users requiring a broad range of out-of-the-box advanced features
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
- Power users requiring a broad range of out-of-the-box advanced features
Process Street
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Tied for overall winner with a composite score of 89%.
Comparable pricing accessibility (Contact Vendor (No Free Trial)).
Tied with a solid set of 11 features.
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Reliable support with a user rating of 5.0/5 stars.
No data available for this product on this dimension yet.
ProcessMaker
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Tied for overall winner with a composite score of 89%.
Comparable pricing accessibility (Contact Vendor (No Free Trial)).
Tied with a solid set of 11 features.
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Reliable support with a user rating of 5.0/5 stars.
No data available for this product on this dimension yet.
⚖️ Virtually Tied
Process Street and ProcessMaker are virtually identical across all key dimensions. The right choice depends entirely on your team's specific workflow needs and integration requirements.
Composite Score Breakdown
Promote Your Software to Business Process Management (BPM) Decision Makers
Frequently asked questions: Process Street vs ProcessMaker
Which is better: Process Street or ProcessMaker?
Process Street and ProcessMaker are virtually identical across all key dimensions. The right choice depends entirely on your team's specific workflow needs and integration requirements. Neither product has a decisive overall lead, so the best choice depends on your workflow, budget and required integrations.
How do users rate Process Street and ProcessMaker?
Process Street is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. ProcessMaker is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
Which is easier to use, Process Street or ProcessMaker?
Process Street has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5, ProcessMaker has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5. The difference is small, so both are similarly easy to adopt.
Most Helpful Reviews
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
Process Street provides a straightforward, dependable solution that integrated smoothly into our operational stack. Uptime is consistent and user adoption across the team was immediate.
We have been using Process Street across our departments and appreciate the simplicity and stability of the system. It handles core workflows without unnecessary bloat.
The platform has streamlined our daily operations, providing reliable tools and responsive support. Configuration was quick and the feature set aligns well with our requirements.
A well-built tool that delivers consistent value. The interface is clean, performance is snappy, and our operational workflows run smoothly.
Login to read full user reviews
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Trending Software
Calculated via real engagement & conversions
Best Alternatives in Business Process Management (BPM)
Other highly-rated software you might want to consider
