MirovsQuip
Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.
Quick answer: Miro vs Quip
In our 2026 comparison of Miro and Quip, the products are too closely matched to name a clear overall winner. Miro is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews; Quip is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Miro has a free plan; Quip starts at $10/month.
Last updated
| At a glance | Miro | Quip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Collaboration Tools | Collaboration Tools |
| User rating | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) |
| Starting price | Free plan | $10/mo |
| Free trial | Yes | Not listed |
| Listed features | 12 | 11 |
| Integrations | 7 | — |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Not specified |
| Ease of use | 4.8/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Customer support | 4.6/5 | 5.0/5 |
Miro
Starting Price
Free plan available; Starter plan starts at $8 per member/month billed annually
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- Powerful collaboration tools
- Powerful collaboration tools,Extensive template library,Excellent user experience,Strong integration ecosystem
- Extensive template library
Cons
- Can become expensive at scale
- Large boards may impact performance
- Can become expensive at scale,Large boards may impact performance
Quip
Starting Price
Contact Vendor
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- It integrates seamlessly with Salesforce, allowing teams to access, compile, and manage customer information efficiently without the need for constant context switching between platforms .
- The platform serves as an effective tool for collaborative document management, making it ideal for project-based work, especially as remote work has become more prevalent .
- Its core strength lies in the ability to share files and documents across teams, reducing the risk of sensitive information being sent to wrong recipients via email .
Cons
- A primary criticism is that the platform attempts to do many things but does not perform any single feature exceptionally well, with the overall feature design being considered mediocre by some users .
- Its flexibility is considered limited, as it tends to force a specific workflow that may not align with how every team naturally operates .
- Some users report that for complex project management needs, it lacks the depth and structure required for complete data-driven decision-making and accountability .
Product Overview
What each platform does and who it's for
Primary Category
The main classification for each product
Editorial Quality Rating
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Miro
Expert Score
Quip
Expert Score
Integration Ecosystem
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Miro Integrations
Quip Integrations
No top integrations listed
Platform Support
Supported platforms across each product
Miro
Quip
Platform support not specified
No platform details listed for this software
Sentiment & Feedback
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
Miro Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- Powerful collaboration tools
- Powerful collaboration tools,Extensive template library,Excellent user experience,Strong integration ecosystem
- Extensive template library
- Excellent user experience
- Strong integration ecosystem
- Can become expensive at scale
- Large boards may impact performance
- Can become expensive at scale,Large boards may impact performance
Quip Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- It integrates seamlessly with Salesforce, allowing teams to access, compile, and manage customer information efficiently without the need for constant context switching between platforms .
- The platform serves as an effective tool for collaborative document management, making it ideal for project-based work, especially as remote work has become more prevalent .
- Its core strength lies in the ability to share files and documents across teams, reducing the risk of sensitive information being sent to wrong recipients via email .
- The platform provides strong task progress tracking, secure data storage, and integrates with other tools like Dropbox Business and GitHub .
- A primary criticism is that the platform attempts to do many things but does not perform any single feature exceptionally well, with the overall feature design being considered mediocre by some users .
- Its flexibility is considered limited, as it tends to force a specific workflow that may not align with how every team naturally operates .
- Some users report that for complex project management needs, it lacks the depth and structure required for complete data-driven decision-making and accountability .
Feature Comparison
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
Miro
12/16 features
- Product development
- Security
- Workshops
- Project planning
- Team collaboration
- AI tools
- Templates Library
- Chat features
- Direct messaging and group chats
- Group chat
- Live Chat
- Real-time Chat
- Team chat
- Collaboration
- Collaboration tools
- Spreadsheets
Quip
11/16 features
- Product development
- Security
- Workshops
- Project planning
- Team collaboration
- AI tools
- Templates Library
- Chat features
- Direct messaging and group chats
- Group chat
- Live Chat
- Real-time Chat
- Team chat
- Collaboration
- Collaboration tools
- Spreadsheets
Pricing & Plans
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Miro Pricing
freemiumQuip Pricing
Essential tools for growing teams.
Complete toolset with premium support.
Custom security and volume license scale.
Community Intelligence
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Community Matchup Voting
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Community vs. Editorial Alignment
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting
Draw
Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Awaiting Votes
Cast your vote above to update results.
Which software did you choose?
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Promote Your Tool to Miro vs Quip Buyers
Feature your software prominently in the sidebar & pricing pages of Miro vs Quip to capture high-intent Collaboration Tools evaluators.
Head-to-Head Winner Analysis
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
Matchup Scoreboard
At-a-glance scorecard results
Weighted Overall Scorecard
Normalized composite performance scores
Smart Recommendation Matrix
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
- Teams seeking a zero-cost or freemium entry tier for Miro
- Teams prioritizing intuitive, zero-learning-curve UX and fast onboarding
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Fast-moving teams needing fluid channel huddles, app bots, and external channel sharing
- Organizations that place high importance on responsive customer support
Miro
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Tied for overall winner with a composite score of 89%.
Miro has the most accessible pricing ($8/mo (Free Trial)).
Tied with a solid set of 12 features.
Ranked #1 for usability with a user rating of 4.8/5 stars.
Decent support with a user rating of 4.6/5 stars.
Not enough data on the other product(s) to rank this dimension fairly.
Quip
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Tied for overall winner with a composite score of 85%.
Pricing: $10/mo (No Free Trial), a less accessible entry point than the leader.
Tied with a solid set of 11 features.
Satisfactory usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Ranked #1 for support with a user rating of 5.0/5 stars.
No data available for this product on this dimension yet.
⚖️ Virtually Tied
Miro and Quip are extremely well-matched overall. If Ease of Use is your priority, Miro has the edge — otherwise, your specific workflow requirements should be the deciding factor.
Composite Score Breakdown
Promote Your Software to Collaboration Tools Decision Makers
Frequently asked questions: Miro vs Quip
Which is better: Miro or Quip?
Miro and Quip are extremely well-matched overall. If Ease of Use is your priority, Miro has the edge — otherwise, your specific workflow requirements should be the deciding factor. Neither product has a decisive overall lead, so the best choice depends on your workflow, budget and required integrations.
How do users rate Miro and Quip?
Miro is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Quip is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
How much do Miro and Quip cost?
Miro has a free plan. Quip starts at $10/month. Miro has the lower entry price. Always confirm current pricing on the vendor's site, as plans change.
Do Miro and Quip offer a free plan or free trial?
Miro offers a free plan and a free trial; Quip does not list a free plan or trial.
Which platforms do Miro and Quip support?
Miro supports Web, Windows, macOS, iOS and Android; platform support is not specified for the others.
Which is easier to use, Miro or Quip?
Miro has an ease-of-use rating of 4.8/5, Quip has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5. Miro is rated easier to use by reviewers.
Most Helpful Reviews
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
Miro provides a straightforward, dependable solution that integrated smoothly into our operational stack. Uptime is consistent and user adoption across the team was immediate.
We have been using Miro across our departments and appreciate the simplicity and stability of the system. It handles core workflows without unnecessary bloat.
The platform has streamlined our daily operations, providing reliable tools and responsive support. Configuration was quick and the feature set aligns well with our requirements.
A well-built tool that delivers consistent value. The interface is clean, performance is snappy, and our operational workflows run smoothly.
Trending Software
Calculated via real engagement & conversions
Best Alternatives in Collaboration Tools
Other highly-rated software you might want to consider
