Make (Integromat)vsn8n
Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.
Quick answer: Make (Integromat) vs n8n
In our 2026 comparison of Make (Integromat) and n8n, n8n comes out ahead overall (weighted score 86% vs 81% for Make (Integromat)). Make (Integromat) is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews; n8n is rated 4.6/5 from 5 user reviews. Make (Integromat) has a free plan; n8n has a free plan.
Last updated
| At a glance | Make (Integromat) | n8n |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Workflow Automation & Integrations | Workflow Automation & Integrations |
| User rating | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) | 4.6/5 (5 reviews) |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Listed features | 17 | 26 |
| Integrations | 7 | 6 |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android | Web |
| Ease of use | 4.5/5 | 4.4/5 |
| Customer support | 4.4/5 | 4.8/5 |
Make (Integromat)
Starting Price
Free ($0/mo | 1000 operations/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-min scheduling), Core ($9/mo | 10000 ops, unlimited scenarios, 1-min scheduling), Pro ($16/mo | 10000 ops, custom variables, full-text execution search), Teams ($29/mo | 10000 ops, team management, scenario locking), Enterprise (Custom | dedicated infrastructure, custom ops volume)
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- More affordable per operation than Zapier with superior data transformation
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than simpler tools like Zapier or IFTTT
n8n
Starting Price
Free (Self-hosted, unlimited workflows and executions), Starter ($24/mo | 2500 cloud executions, 1 shared project, 5 concurrent, unlimited steps, forum support), Pro ($60/mo | 10000 executions, 3 shared projects, 20 concurrent, 7-day insights), Business ($800/mo | 40000 executions, 6 shared projects, SSO/SAML, version control via Git), Enterprise (Custom | unlimited projects, 200+ concurrent, 365-day insights)
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- Completely free when self-hosted — best value in the automation space
Cons
- Steeper learning curve especially for non-technical users
Product Overview
What each platform does and who it's for
Primary Category
The main classification for each product
Editorial Quality Rating
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Make (Integromat)
Expert Score
n8n
Expert Score
Integration Ecosystem
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Make (Integromat) Integrations
n8n Integrations
Platform Support
Supported platforms across each product
Make (Integromat)
n8n
Sentiment & Feedback
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
Make (Integromat) Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- More affordable per operation than Zapier with superior data transformation
- Steeper learning curve than simpler tools like Zapier or IFTTT
n8n Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- Completely free when self-hosted — best value in the automation space
- Steeper learning curve especially for non-technical users
Feature Comparison
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
Make (Integromat)
16/35 features
- AI agents
- API & Webhook Integrations
- API access
- API integration
- App Integrations
- Custom HTTP request nodes
- Drag-and-drop scenario builder
- Error handling and retry logic
- Integrations
- Real-time execution logs
- Webhooks
- Workflow Automation
- Advanced routing and branching
- Data mapping
- Code nodes
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Open-source
- Security controls
- Real-time data
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Advanced automation
- Automation
- Active community templates
- Templates Library
- Visual workflows
- Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
- Full data control with self-hosting
- Hosting
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Monitoring & Alerting
- Network monitoring
- Open-source fair-code license
- Remote monitoring
- Server Monitoring
- Self-hosting
n8n
26/35 features
- AI agents
- API & Webhook Integrations
- API access
- API integration
- App Integrations
- Custom HTTP request nodes
- Drag-and-drop scenario builder
- Error handling and retry logic
- Integrations
- Real-time execution logs
- Webhooks
- Workflow Automation
- Advanced routing and branching
- Data mapping
- Code nodes
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Open-source
- Security controls
- Real-time data
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Advanced automation
- Automation
- Active community templates
- Templates Library
- Visual workflows
- Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
- Full data control with self-hosting
- Hosting
- Infrastructure Monitoring
- Monitoring & Alerting
- Network monitoring
- Open-source fair-code license
- Remote monitoring
- Server Monitoring
- Self-hosting
Login to see the complete feature comparison
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Pricing & Plans
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Make (Integromat) Pricing
Freen8n Pricing
OPEN_SOURCELogin to see detailed pricing plans & tiers
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Community Intelligence
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Community Matchup Voting
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Community vs. Editorial Alignment
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting
n8n
Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Awaiting Votes
Cast your vote above to update results.
Which software did you choose?
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Promote to Make (Integromat) vs n8n Buyers
Capture high-intent Workflow Automation & Integrations evaluators
Head-to-Head Winner Analysis
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
Matchup Scoreboard
At-a-glance scorecard results
Weighted Overall Scorecard
Normalized composite performance scores
Smart Recommendation Matrix
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
- Organizations requiring enterprise SLA support, governance, and custom security
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
- Organizations requiring enterprise SLA support, governance, and custom security
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
Make (Integromat)
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Make (Integromat) is a runner-up with a composite score of 81%.
Comparable pricing accessibility ($9/mo (Free Trial)).
Offers 17 features (fewer than the category leader).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Decent support with a user rating of 4.4/5 stars.
Widest platform availability (5 Platforms: Windows, macOS, Web, iOS +1 more).
n8n
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
n8n wins overall with a weighted score of 86% based on user rating, pricing, features, usability, and support.
Comparable pricing accessibility (€24/mo (Free Trial)).
n8n lists the most features (26 features).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.4/5 stars.
Ranked #1 for support with a user rating of 4.8/5 stars.
Available on 1 Platform: Web, fewer than the leader.
Final Verdict:n8n
n8n scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 5-point lead in our weighted analysis.
Promote Your Software to Workflow Automation & Integrations Decision Makers
Frequently asked questions: Make (Integromat) vs n8n
Which is better: Make (Integromat) or n8n?
n8n scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 5-point lead in our weighted analysis. The best choice still depends on your team's workflow, budget and required integrations — use the side-by-side sections above to check the details that matter to you.
How do users rate Make (Integromat) and n8n?
Make (Integromat) is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. n8n is rated 4.6/5 from 5 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
How much do Make (Integromat) and n8n cost?
Make (Integromat) has a free plan. n8n has a free plan. Always confirm current pricing on the vendor's site, as plans change.
Do Make (Integromat) and n8n offer a free plan or free trial?
Make (Integromat) offers a free plan and a free trial; n8n offers a free plan and a free trial.
Which platforms do Make (Integromat) and n8n support?
Make (Integromat) supports Windows, macOS, Web, iOS and Android; n8n supports Web.
Which is easier to use, Make (Integromat) or n8n?
Make (Integromat) has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5, n8n has an ease-of-use rating of 4.4/5. The difference is small, so both are similarly easy to adopt.
Most Helpful Reviews
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
Make (Integromat) provides a straightforward, dependable solution that integrated smoothly into our operational stack. Uptime is consistent and user adoption across the team was immediate.
We have been using Make (Integromat) across our departments and appreciate the simplicity and stability of the system. It handles core workflows without unnecessary bloat.
The platform has streamlined our daily operations, providing reliable tools and responsive support. Configuration was quick and the feature set aligns well with our requirements.
A well-built tool that delivers consistent value. The interface is clean, performance is snappy, and our operational workflows run smoothly.
Login to read full user reviews
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Trending Software
Calculated via real engagement & conversions
Best Alternatives in Workflow Automation & Integrations
Other highly-rated software you might want to consider
