KeycloakvsRSA SecurID
Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.
Quick answer: Keycloak vs RSA SecurID
In our 2026 comparison of Keycloak and RSA SecurID, Keycloak comes out ahead overall (weighted score 87% vs 81% for RSA SecurID). Keycloak is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews; RSA SecurID is rated 4.5/5 from 5 user reviews. Keycloak has a free plan; RSA SecurID has a free plan.
Last updated
| At a glance | Keycloak | RSA SecurID |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & Access Management (IAM) | Identity & Access Management (IAM) |
| User rating | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) | 4.5/5 (5 reviews) |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Listed features | 20 | 13 |
| Integrations | 7 | — |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS |
| Ease of use | 4.4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Customer support | 4.4/5 | 4.9/5 |
Keycloak
Starting Price
Free open-source identity and access management platform
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- Large community ecosystem
- Completely open-source,Strong standards support,Comprehensive authentication features,Large community ecosystem,Flexible deployment options
- Flexible deployment options
Cons
- Steep learning curve for beginners,Administration can be complex,Enterprise support requires third-party vendors
- Enterprise support requires third-party vendors
- Steep learning curve for beginners
RSA SecurID
Starting Price
Subscription
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- The solution provides robust and reliable two-factor authentication, enhancing security for remote access and is trusted by many large organizations worldwide .
- It offers ease of integration and deployment, with flexible deployment options available to suit various business needs and existing IT infrastructures .
- RSA provides comprehensive support, regular updates, and the platform ensures secure remote access with minimal downtime and consistent performance .
Cons
- The high cost is often cited as a significant drawback, which can deter small to medium-sized businesses from adopting the solution .
- The setup and configuration process can be complex and time-consuming, and administrators may encounter token synchronization issues that add to the maintenance overhead .
- Some users find the interface difficult to manage and navigate, and the hardware tokens can be bulky and inconvenient to carry .
Product Overview
What each platform does and who it's for
Primary Category
The main classification for each product
Editorial Quality Rating
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Keycloak
Expert Score
RSA SecurID
Expert Score
Integration Ecosystem
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Keycloak Integrations
RSA SecurID Integrations
No top integrations listed
Platform Support
Supported platforms across each product
Keycloak
RSA SecurID
Sentiment & Feedback
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
Keycloak Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- Large community ecosystem
- Completely open-source,Strong standards support,Comprehensive authentication features,Large community ecosystem,Flexible deployment options
- Flexible deployment options
- Completely open-source
- Strong standards support
- Steep learning curve for beginners,Administration can be complex,Enterprise support requires third-party vendors
- Enterprise support requires third-party vendors
- Steep learning curve for beginners
- Administration can be complex
RSA SecurID Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- The solution provides robust and reliable two-factor authentication, enhancing security for remote access and is trusted by many large organizations worldwide .
- It offers ease of integration and deployment, with flexible deployment options available to suit various business needs and existing IT infrastructures .
- RSA provides comprehensive support, regular updates, and the platform ensures secure remote access with minimal downtime and consistent performance .
- The hard token option is a valuable feature for organizations that prefer or require a physical hardware authenticator over a software-only MFA solution .
- The high cost is often cited as a significant drawback, which can deter small to medium-sized businesses from adopting the solution .
- The setup and configuration process can be complex and time-consuming, and administrators may encounter token synchronization issues that add to the maintenance overhead .
- Some users find the interface difficult to manage and navigate, and the hardware tokens can be bulky and inconvenient to carry .
Feature Comparison
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
Keycloak
19/26 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- Access control
- Advanced security
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
- Open-source
- Role-Based Access Control
- SAML Support
- Security
- Security controls
- Single Sign-On (SSO) & MFA
- Cross-device sync
- Developer tools
- Identity Management
- One-time passcodes
- Strengthen identity assurance
- OAuth 2.0
- Social Login
- User Management
- Team collaboration
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Maintain secure access across on-premises and hybrid environments
- OpenID Connect
- Single Sign-On
- User Federation
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
RSA SecurID
13/26 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- Access control
- Advanced security
- Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
- Open-source
- Role-Based Access Control
- SAML Support
- Security
- Security controls
- Single Sign-On (SSO) & MFA
- Cross-device sync
- Developer tools
- Identity Management
- One-time passcodes
- Strengthen identity assurance
- OAuth 2.0
- Social Login
- User Management
- Team collaboration
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Maintain secure access across on-premises and hybrid environments
- OpenID Connect
- Single Sign-On
- User Federation
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
Login to see the complete feature comparison
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Pricing & Plans
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Keycloak Pricing
OPEN_SOURCERSA SecurID Pricing
SUBSCRIPTIONFree to use. No credit card required.
Login to see detailed pricing plans & tiers
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Community Intelligence
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Community Matchup Voting
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Community vs. Editorial Alignment
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting
Keycloak
Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Awaiting Votes
Cast your vote above to update results.
Which software did you choose?
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Promote to Keycloak vs RSA SecurID Buyers
Capture high-intent Identity & Access Management (IAM) evaluators
Head-to-Head Winner Analysis
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
Matchup Scoreboard
At-a-glance scorecard results
Weighted Overall Scorecard
Normalized composite performance scores
Smart Recommendation Matrix
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
- Startups building scalable user auth without managing custom session or token infrastructure
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams needing broad multi-platform accessibility across desktop, mobile, and web
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
Keycloak
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Keycloak wins overall with a weighted score of 87% based on user rating, pricing, features, usability, and support.
Comparable pricing accessibility ($0/mo (No Free Trial)).
Keycloak lists the most features (20 features).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.4/5 stars.
Decent support with a user rating of 4.4/5 stars.
Available on 4 Platforms: Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, fewer than the leader.
RSA SecurID
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
RSA SecurID is a runner-up with a composite score of 81%.
Comparable pricing accessibility ($0/mo (No Free Trial)).
Offers 13 features (fewer than the category leader).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Ranked #1 for support with a user rating of 4.9/5 stars.
Widest platform availability (6 Platforms: Web, Windows, macOS, Linux +2 more).
Final Verdict:Keycloak
Keycloak scores higher across 3 of 11 key dimensions with a 6-point lead in our weighted analysis.
Promote Your Software to Identity & Access Management (IAM) Decision Makers
Frequently asked questions: Keycloak vs RSA SecurID
Which is better: Keycloak or RSA SecurID?
Keycloak scores higher across 3 of 11 key dimensions with a 6-point lead in our weighted analysis. The best choice still depends on your team's workflow, budget and required integrations — use the side-by-side sections above to check the details that matter to you.
How do users rate Keycloak and RSA SecurID?
Keycloak is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. RSA SecurID is rated 4.5/5 from 5 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
How much do Keycloak and RSA SecurID cost?
Keycloak has a free plan. RSA SecurID has a free plan. Always confirm current pricing on the vendor's site, as plans change.
Do Keycloak and RSA SecurID offer a free plan or free trial?
Keycloak offers a free plan; RSA SecurID offers a free plan.
Which platforms do Keycloak and RSA SecurID support?
Keycloak supports Web, Windows, macOS and Linux; RSA SecurID supports Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS and Android.
Which is easier to use, Keycloak or RSA SecurID?
Keycloak has an ease-of-use rating of 4.4/5, RSA SecurID has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5. The difference is small, so both are similarly easy to adopt.
Most Helpful Reviews
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
Partnering with Keycloak accelerated our development timeline significantly. Their engineering team demonstrated strong technical depth, adhering strictly to milestones and clean coding standards.
Our enterprise infrastructure integration was handled seamlessly by Keycloak. Communication was transparent, sprint deliveries were predictable, and architecture reviews were comprehensive.
The technical team at Keycloak proved to be dependable and knowledgeable across our full-stack modernization project. They resolved complex integration bottlenecks with high efficiency.
High-caliber engineering services with dependable project management. Keycloak consistently delivered quality deliverables with thorough automated testing coverage.
Login to read full user reviews
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Trending Software
Calculated via real engagement & conversions
Best Alternatives in Identity & Access Management (IAM)
Other highly-rated software you might want to consider
