DubvsMake (Integromat)
Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.
Quick answer: Dub vs Make (Integromat)
In our 2026 comparison of Dub and Make (Integromat), Make (Integromat) comes out ahead overall (weighted score 87% vs 81% for Dub). Dub is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews; Make (Integromat) is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Dub has a free plan; Make (Integromat) has a free plan.
Last updated
| At a glance | Dub | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Workflow Automation & Integrations | Workflow Automation & Integrations |
| User rating | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free trial | Not listed | Yes |
| Listed features | 11 | 17 |
| Integrations | — | 7 |
| Platforms | Not specified | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android |
| Ease of use | 4.5/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Customer support | 5.0/5 | 4.4/5 |
Dub
Starting Price
Free
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- A modern link management platform for creating, sharing, and tracking short links, often used for marketing campaigns.
- Provides robust analytics, including click tracking, geo-location, and device data, to measure link performance.
- Offers features like custom domains, QR code generation, and link retargeting for marketing and attribution.
Cons
- As a link shortener, its functionality is narrow; it's not a general-purpose tool for project management or productivity.
- High-volume link tracking may require a paid plan, as usage-based pricing applies.
- The service's value is heavily dependent on its analytics; if you don't need detailed click data, a simpler free tool may suffice.
Make (Integromat)
Starting Price
Free ($0/mo | 1000 operations/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-min scheduling), Core ($9/mo | 10000 ops, unlimited scenarios, 1-min scheduling), Pro ($16/mo | 10000 ops, custom variables, full-text execution search), Teams ($29/mo | 10000 ops, team management, scenario locking), Enterprise (Custom | dedicated infrastructure, custom ops volume)
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- More affordable per operation than Zapier with superior data transformation
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than simpler tools like Zapier or IFTTT
Product Overview
What each platform does and who it's for
Primary Category
The main classification for each product
Editorial Quality Rating
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Dub
Expert Score
Make (Integromat)
Expert Score
Integration Ecosystem
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Dub Integrations
No top integrations listed
Make (Integromat) Integrations
Platform Support
Supported platforms across each product
Dub
Platform support not specified
No platform details listed for this software
Make (Integromat)
Sentiment & Feedback
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
Dub Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- A modern link management platform for creating, sharing, and tracking short links, often used for marketing campaigns.
- Provides robust analytics, including click tracking, geo-location, and device data, to measure link performance.
- Offers features like custom domains, QR code generation, and link retargeting for marketing and attribution.
- Open-source and self-hostable option is available, providing data control for privacy-conscious users.
- As a link shortener, its functionality is narrow; it's not a general-purpose tool for project management or productivity.
- High-volume link tracking may require a paid plan, as usage-based pricing applies.
- The service's value is heavily dependent on its analytics; if you don't need detailed click data, a simpler free tool may suffice.
Make (Integromat) Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- More affordable per operation than Zapier with superior data transformation
- Steeper learning curve than simpler tools like Zapier or IFTTT
Feature Comparison
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
Dub
11/25 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- API access
- App Integrations
- Drag-and-drop scenario builder
- Integrations
- Real-time execution logs
- Webhooks
- Workflow Automation
- Advanced routing and branching
- Data mapping
- Cross-device sync
- Real-time data
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Security
- Security controls
- Project management
- Project organization
- Team collaboration
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Automation
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
- Monitoring & Alerting
- Task management
- To-do lists
Make (Integromat)
16/25 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- API access
- App Integrations
- Drag-and-drop scenario builder
- Integrations
- Real-time execution logs
- Webhooks
- Workflow Automation
- Advanced routing and branching
- Data mapping
- Cross-device sync
- Real-time data
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Security
- Security controls
- Project management
- Project organization
- Team collaboration
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Automation
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
- Monitoring & Alerting
- Task management
- To-do lists
Login to see the complete feature comparison
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Pricing & Plans
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Dub Pricing
FREEFree to use. No credit card required.
Make (Integromat) Pricing
FreeLogin to see detailed pricing plans & tiers
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Community Intelligence
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Community Matchup Voting
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Community vs. Editorial Alignment
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting
Make (Integromat)
Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Awaiting Votes
Cast your vote above to update results.
Which software did you choose?
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Promote to Dub vs Make (Integromat) Buyers
Capture high-intent Workflow Automation & Integrations evaluators
Head-to-Head Winner Analysis
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
Matchup Scoreboard
At-a-glance scorecard results
Weighted Overall Scorecard
Normalized composite performance scores
Smart Recommendation Matrix
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Organizations that place high importance on responsive customer support
- Organizations requiring enterprise SLA support, governance, and custom security
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
Dub
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Dub is a runner-up with a composite score of 81%.
Pricing: $0/mo (No Free Trial), a less accessible entry point than the leader.
Offers 11 features (fewer than the category leader).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Ranked #1 for support with a user rating of 5.0/5 stars.
No data available for this product on this dimension yet.
Make (Integromat)
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Make (Integromat) wins overall with a weighted score of 87% based on user rating, pricing, features, usability, and support.
Make (Integromat) has the most accessible pricing ($9/mo (Free Trial)).
Make (Integromat) lists the most features (17 features).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Decent support with a user rating of 4.4/5 stars.
Not enough data on the other product(s) to rank this dimension fairly.
Final Verdict:Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat) scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 6-point lead in our weighted analysis.
Promote Your Software to Workflow Automation & Integrations Decision Makers
Frequently asked questions: Dub vs Make (Integromat)
Which is better: Dub or Make (Integromat)?
Make (Integromat) scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 6-point lead in our weighted analysis. The best choice still depends on your team's workflow, budget and required integrations — use the side-by-side sections above to check the details that matter to you.
How do users rate Dub and Make (Integromat)?
Dub is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Make (Integromat) is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
How much do Dub and Make (Integromat) cost?
Dub has a free plan. Make (Integromat) has a free plan. Always confirm current pricing on the vendor's site, as plans change.
Do Dub and Make (Integromat) offer a free plan or free trial?
Dub offers a free plan; Make (Integromat) offers a free plan and a free trial.
Which platforms do Dub and Make (Integromat) support?
Make (Integromat) supports Windows, macOS, Web, iOS and Android; platform support is not specified for the others.
Which is easier to use, Dub or Make (Integromat)?
Dub has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5, Make (Integromat) has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5. The difference is small, so both are similarly easy to adopt.
Most Helpful Reviews
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
Dub provides a straightforward, dependable solution that integrated smoothly into our operational stack. Uptime is consistent and user adoption across the team was immediate.
We have been using Dub across our departments and appreciate the simplicity and stability of the system. It handles core workflows without unnecessary bloat.
The platform has streamlined our daily operations, providing reliable tools and responsive support. Configuration was quick and the feature set aligns well with our requirements.
A well-built tool that delivers consistent value. The interface is clean, performance is snappy, and our operational workflows run smoothly.
Login to read full user reviews
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Trending Software
Calculated via real engagement & conversions
Best Alternatives in Workflow Automation & Integrations
Other highly-rated software you might want to consider
