CamundavsMake (Integromat)
Unbiased side-by-side comparison of verified reviews, user ratings, features, and pros/cons to help you decide which software fits your business needs.
Quick answer: Camunda vs Make (Integromat)
In our 2026 comparison of Camunda and Make (Integromat), Make (Integromat) comes out ahead overall (weighted score 87% vs 82% for Camunda). Camunda is rated 4.5/5 from 5 user reviews; Make (Integromat) is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Camunda has a free plan; Make (Integromat) has a free plan.
Last updated
| At a glance | Camunda | Make (Integromat) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Workflow Automation & Integrations | Workflow Automation & Integrations |
| User rating | 4.5/5 (5 reviews) | 4.5/5 (4 reviews) |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Listed features | 14 | 17 |
| Integrations | — | 7 |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows, macOS | Windows, macOS, Web, iOS, Android |
| Ease of use | 4.4/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Customer support | 4.8/5 | 4.4/5 |
Camunda
Starting Price
Freemium
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- It is a versatile workflow automation platform that integrates seamlessly with the Java ecosystem, particularly with Spring Boot and popular Java libraries, making it a natural fit for Java development teams .
- Its cloud-native architecture, powered by the Zeebe workflow engine, allows for horizontal scaling and distributed processing, ideal for large-scale applications .
- It includes prebuilt connectors for REST APIs, Kafka, and databases, as well as AI platforms, eliminating the need for teams to write boilerplate integration code .
Cons
- To use the latest cloud-native features, you need to use Camunda 8; earlier versions (Camunda 7) are vastly different and require a migration path.
- While powerful, it introduces a new layer of complexity to your application architecture, requiring dedicated learning for your team.
- The flexibility and scalability of the tool may be overkill for small teams with simple, linear workflow automation needs.
Make (Integromat)
Starting Price
Free ($0/mo | 1000 operations/month, 2 active scenarios, 15-min scheduling), Core ($9/mo | 10000 ops, unlimited scenarios, 1-min scheduling), Pro ($16/mo | 10000 ops, custom variables, full-text execution search), Teams ($29/mo | 10000 ops, team management, scenario locking), Enterprise (Custom | dedicated infrastructure, custom ops volume)
Community Pulse
Advanced Ratings
Pros
- More affordable per operation than Zapier with superior data transformation
Cons
- Steeper learning curve than simpler tools like Zapier or IFTTT
Product Overview
What each platform does and who it's for
Primary Category
The main classification for each product
Editorial Quality Rating
Independent expert panel ratings and quality validations
Camunda
Expert Score
Make (Integromat)
Expert Score
Integration Ecosystem
Compare supported third-party apps and services
Camunda Integrations
No top integrations listed
Make (Integromat) Integrations
Platform Support
Supported platforms across each product
Camunda
Make (Integromat)
Sentiment & Feedback
Real-world pros and cons from verified users
Camunda Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- It is a versatile workflow automation platform that integrates seamlessly with the Java ecosystem, particularly with Spring Boot and popular Java libraries, making it a natural fit for Java development teams .
- Its cloud-native architecture, powered by the Zeebe workflow engine, allows for horizontal scaling and distributed processing, ideal for large-scale applications .
- It includes prebuilt connectors for REST APIs, Kafka, and databases, as well as AI platforms, eliminating the need for teams to write boilerplate integration code .
- It offers flexible deployment options, including on-premise, cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), and hybrid, allowing teams to choose the infrastructure that best suits their needs .
- To use the latest cloud-native features, you need to use Camunda 8; earlier versions (Camunda 7) are vastly different and require a migration path.
- While powerful, it introduces a new layer of complexity to your application architecture, requiring dedicated learning for your team.
- The flexibility and scalability of the tool may be overkill for small teams with simple, linear workflow automation needs.
Make (Integromat) Feedback
User sentiment analysis
- More affordable per operation than Zapier with superior data transformation
- Steeper learning curve than simpler tools like Zapier or IFTTT
Feature Comparison
Detailed side-by-side capability checklist
Camunda
14/26 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- API access
- App Integrations
- Business rules
- Distributed microservices
- Drag-and-drop scenario builder
- Integrations
- Real-time execution logs
- Webhooks
- Workflow Automation
- Advanced routing and branching
- Data mapping
- Cross-device sync
- Real-time data
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Security
- Security controls
- Team collaboration
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Agentic AI bots with decision-making
- Automation
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
- APIs and operational tools for modeling and monitoring processes
- Monitoring & Alerting
- Services
Make (Integromat)
16/26 features
- API & Webhook Integrations
- API access
- App Integrations
- Business rules
- Distributed microservices
- Drag-and-drop scenario builder
- Integrations
- Real-time execution logs
- Webhooks
- Workflow Automation
- Advanced routing and branching
- Data mapping
- Cross-device sync
- Real-time data
- Drag-and-drop interface
- Security
- Security controls
- Team collaboration
- Audit Logging & Monitoring
- Agentic AI bots with decision-making
- Automation
- Multi-platform support
- Reporting & Analytics
- APIs and operational tools for modeling and monitoring processes
- Monitoring & Alerting
- Services
Login to see the complete feature comparison
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Pricing & Plans
Compare plans, features, and starting points side-by-side
Camunda Pricing
FREEMIUMFree to use. No credit card required.
Make (Integromat) Pricing
FreeLogin to see detailed pricing plans & tiers
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Community Intelligence
Real-time crowdsourced comparison feedback and buyer signals.
Community Matchup Voting
Real-time crowdsourced buyer signals
Community vs. Editorial Alignment
Agreement between algorithmic rating & user voting
Make (Integromat)
Calculated by features, pricing, support & ratings.
Awaiting Votes
Cast your vote above to update results.
Which software did you choose?
Share your decision anonymously with the community
Promote to Camunda vs Make (Integromat) Buyers
Capture high-intent Workflow Automation & Integrations evaluators
Head-to-Head Winner Analysis
Data-backed performance comparisons across pricing, features, usability, and support
Matchup Scoreboard
At-a-glance scorecard results
Weighted Overall Scorecard
Normalized composite performance scores
Smart Recommendation Matrix
Head-to-head decision matrix based on your business workflow
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Organizations that place high importance on responsive customer support
- Organizations requiring enterprise SLA support, governance, and custom security
- Users wanting a streamlined, user-friendly workspace interface
- Teams looking for native integration with core workflow tools
Camunda
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Camunda is a runner-up with a composite score of 82%.
Comparable pricing accessibility ($0/mo (Free Trial)).
Offers 14 features (fewer than the category leader).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.4/5 stars.
Ranked #1 for support with a user rating of 4.8/5 stars.
Tied on platform availability (4 Platforms: Web, Linux, Windows, macOS).
Make (Integromat)
Dimension scorecard
Multi-Dimension Performance
Winner Breakdown & Analysis
Make (Integromat) wins overall with a weighted score of 87% based on user rating, pricing, features, usability, and support.
Comparable pricing accessibility ($9/mo (Free Trial)).
Make (Integromat) lists the most features (17 features).
Strong usability with a user rating of 4.5/5 stars.
Decent support with a user rating of 4.4/5 stars.
Tied on platform availability (5 Platforms: Windows, macOS, Web, iOS +1 more).
Final Verdict:Make (Integromat)
Make (Integromat) scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 5-point lead in our weighted analysis.
Promote Your Software to Workflow Automation & Integrations Decision Makers
Frequently asked questions: Camunda vs Make (Integromat)
Which is better: Camunda or Make (Integromat)?
Make (Integromat) scores higher across 2 of 11 key dimensions with a 5-point lead in our weighted analysis. The best choice still depends on your team's workflow, budget and required integrations — use the side-by-side sections above to check the details that matter to you.
How do users rate Camunda and Make (Integromat)?
Camunda is rated 4.5/5 from 5 user reviews. Make (Integromat) is rated 4.5/5 from 4 user reviews. Ratings come from approved user reviews on SoftwareHope.
How much do Camunda and Make (Integromat) cost?
Camunda has a free plan. Make (Integromat) has a free plan. Always confirm current pricing on the vendor's site, as plans change.
Do Camunda and Make (Integromat) offer a free plan or free trial?
Camunda offers a free plan and a free trial; Make (Integromat) offers a free plan and a free trial.
Which platforms do Camunda and Make (Integromat) support?
Camunda supports Web, Linux, Windows and macOS; Make (Integromat) supports Windows, macOS, Web, iOS and Android.
Which is easier to use, Camunda or Make (Integromat)?
Camunda has an ease-of-use rating of 4.4/5, Make (Integromat) has an ease-of-use rating of 4.5/5. The difference is small, so both are similarly easy to adopt.
Most Helpful Reviews
Community-voted helpful feedback from verified users
Camunda provides a straightforward, dependable solution that integrated smoothly into our operational stack. Uptime is consistent and user adoption across the team was immediate.
We have been using Camunda across our departments and appreciate the simplicity and stability of the system. It handles core workflows without unnecessary bloat.
The platform has streamlined our daily operations, providing reliable tools and responsive support. Configuration was quick and the feature set aligns well with our requirements.
A well-built tool that delivers consistent value. The interface is clean, performance is snappy, and our operational workflows run smoothly.
Login to read full user reviews
Free account — takes 10 seconds
No credit card required. Create account
Trending Software
Calculated via real engagement & conversions
Best Alternatives in Workflow Automation & Integrations
Other highly-rated software you might want to consider
